But for coop, waiting for 10 minutes to get your turn is a turn off for some. This is not really an issue in solo play. Simultaneous turns would solve that problem, something common in many TBS, but THAT would require quite a large rework =)Įdit: Also, this has been a lament of me an many a friend of mine, TW campainngs take long and would be nice to be able to play with 3 others instead of starting a new campaing which each one, so in all honesty, personally I'd be willing to pay for this feature in the form a of a small dlc :PĪ big issue for such campaigns is the viability of it all.Īs you are nearing turn 100, it is not uncommon for a turn to take about 10 minutes(and that is excluding all the combat), just to move all your armies and manage all your settlements. It is not something beyond the current engine likely, but they propably consider getting it stable would require too much work hours put in versus the additional sales they'd get for spending that effort, considering for many people the 4 player turn times would be too much.
Also campaing balance would be even more skewed. I suspect the reasons has more to do with desyncs between 4 clients so on the actual campaing map as I don't think their netcode and handling of current state has been spent that much effort on. Adding more factions to be controlle by players doesn't require any larger battles than there is currently. Why would you need that? Already you can have multiple factions in the fight, giving away troops to control for others is a thing, 2v2 is a thing outside a campaing etc, works perfectly fine. But maybe it would just lock it at 60 vs 60 since the game isnt meant for 3 ppl but you get the idea. Not to mention can only field 40 troops max per faction, so if you're going vs 1 AI would be 120v40 (2 stacks per player vs max 2 of AI) troops in current game plus I think you could let AI control 1 army to further bring a 3rd stack each thus making it 120 + 60 AI troops vs 40 AI before reinforcements get blocked. New engine would be needed as Bruce stated, game already struggles with 40v40 battles. Originally posted by Kantermoose:60 stacks (each 1 stack of each 3 players) those battles would be <10 fps lag fests
0 kommentar(er)
